Showing posts with label Evaluation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evaluation. Show all posts

Sunday, 22 February 2015

Evaluation of chasing pavements

Every Single lesson (Monday, Tuesday and Thursday) we would split into our groups and start our rehearsals for our devising piece. We didn’t have a schedule however at the beginning we would discuss whether we wanted to create a new scene or improve the scenes that we had already formed.  Every few lessons we would brainstorm our current ideas and just talk discuss what we thought about them.

Throughout the rehearsal process myself and other members of the group would experiment on ways we could use stage combat that is used with in the piece. Some members and I have been to some workshops in the past which has allowed us to use a slightly wider variety of stage combat and also allowed us to experiment  with our technique slightly more. Personally I think that the “punches” that were being thrown in the show were believable to an extent, I think that the only thing that didn’t make it believable was that there wasn’t much of an effect on the character that I was beating (black eye/broken nose).

Overall I think that the performance went good, there were a few minor errors that weren’t meant to happen however I think that we just went on with it and got it done with. One thing that I think really worked with our performance is that the scaffolding in the back worked rather well through put the whole thing; it was used pretty well for the date scene, the movement scene, the other date scene, and the stage combat scene. However I think that it mainly based around it when it wasn’t really necessary.

In my opinion as a group I personally think that we didn’t work well together due to too many distractions and at the week before the show few people decided that scenes we had come up with were too “cheesy” which I didn’t really agree with but other people agreed so I just had to go with it and make up something new. Another reason I say this is that during the process of developing the ideas people weren’t taking it seriously enough and it became fairly irritating when ideas that are good were being put down because some people would say they didn’t like the song when it would have fitted nicely.


When looking at the techniques, I think that it went quite well as there was quite a variety (Movement, Monologs, Split Screen, Stage Combat, Slow motion) . 

After our performance as a group we discussed what we thought went well (www = what went well) and then if there was anything we could improve (ebi = even better if). Even though we thought that the performance went well, we thought that there were a lot of things that could have been improved. I agree with all the ebi’s, but ones that I would really say that matches my opinion is the “more naturalistic” as it did seem a bit farfetched and really unrealistic however that is something that the group also agreed with and we said that it would be more engaging to an audience if it was something that they can relate to.  Another point that I agree with is “developing of characters”. I would probably say this is the most important point in the ebi’s as when we cut off characters, personally I don’t feel that the audience felt the emotions that we were hoping and by developing a character we can really engage with the audience so when someone they like gets cut off they feel upset or the emotions that we aim for them to feel.